There have been many domestic laws and international
conventions which have had the objective of regulating international
corruption. Many have met with limited success and have suffered from similar
shortcomings. The United Nations brought into force the Convention against
Corruption in 2005 with the aim of addressing these shortcomings. The UNCAC’s
new approach is overall a step in the right direction, but there is still much
room for improvement in this area.
Corruption was defined by the IMF in 2011 as the abuse of
public authority or trust for private benefit. In the context of international
trade and business, corruption often takes the form of payments by corporations
to persons in authority in order that they exercise their discretion in their
favour.
Regulation initially had a narrow definition of corruption
and focused primarily on bribery, and the regulation was very soft and lacked
bite. An example of a domestic law of this type is the USA’s Foreign Corrupt
Practice Act which came into force in 1977; this law had a very narrow approach
as it solely prohibits bribery of foreign public officials, and it expressly
permitted ‘facilitating’ payments which do not involve the corruption of a
discretion per se, but merely speed up a corporation receiving what it is
entitled to, and it permitted payments which are legal in the country in which
they are made. An example of an international convention is the United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime
which came into force in 2003. Although this convention prohibited passive as
well as active bribery, the scope of the Convention is still limited to bribery
and fails to address other forms of corruption. Moreover, the only enforcement
mechanism is self-reporting by member states; there is no external monitoring
or sanctions on member states for breaching the Convention.
What the UNCAC brought to the regulation of international
corruption is a convention which addresses a wide range of corrupt practices,
is ratified by a large number of countries, and has a coordinated, deeply
penetrating application.
UNCAC’s definition of corruption is not limited to bribery
of foreign public officials, but addresses bribery of domestic public
officials, bribery of officials of public international organisations and
bribery of private individuals.
UNCAC is ratified by 140 member states and requires them to
provide mutual assistance in combating corruption. Unlike its predecessors, it
puts specific obligations on member states such as to allow damages against
victims of corruption and to recover and return stolen assets. Another aspect
of the UNCAC which contributes to its deep penetration is that it aims to
mobilise societies at large against corruption, which can be seen in the
establishment of the UNCAC coalition, a network of over 300 civil society
organisations.
Despite the promising new approach of the UNCAC, its
implementation has revealed some areas for improvement. One such area is the
weakness of its monitoring system; in January 2008, only 52% of states had
completed the self-assessment. Also, many developing countries have struggled to
fulfil their obligations under UNCAC due to a lack of policy guidance and
technical assistance.
Law Tutors Online, UK Law Tutor, UK Law Notes, Manchester Law Tutor, Birmingham Law Tutor, Nottingham Law Tutor, Oxford Law Tutor, Cambridge Law Tutor, New York Law Tutor, Sydney Law Tutor, Singapore Law Tutor, Hong Kong Law Tutor, London Tutors, Top Tutors Online and London Law Tutor are trading names of London Law Tutor Ltd. which is a company registered in England and Wales. Company Registration Number: 08253481. VAT Registration Number: 160291824 Registered Data Controller: ZA236376 Registered office: Berkeley Square House, Berkeley Square, London, UK W1J 6BD. All Rights Reserved. Copyright © 2012-2024.